Page 114 - CBSE Annual Report 2013-14

fjiksVZ ls ;g rF; lkeus vkrk gS fd lhlhbZ dks The Report refects the fact that in the frst ykxw djus ds ckn igys o"kZ esa] Dykl #e ds year afer implementaton of CCE, there has v/;kiu rFkk v/;;u esa egRoiw.kZ lq/kkj vk;k gSA been considerable improvement in classroom o"kZ 2009 ¼xSj lhlhbZ vof/k esa½ nloha d{kk dk ikl teaching and learning. While class X pass percentage in 2013 recorded a high of 98.76% izfr'kr 88-84% Fkk tksfd 2013 esa c<+dj 98-76% up from 88.84% in 2009 (non-CCE days), the frst gks x;k] lhch,lbZ esa lrr~ rFkk O;kid ewY;kadu ever analysis of how students have performed ¼lhlhbZ½ ds ykxw gksus ds i'pkr d{kk Xii dh cksMZ in Class XII boards afer the Contnuous and & ijh{kk esa Nk=ksa }kjk fd, x, lq/kkj ds ckjs esa Comprehensive Evaluaton (CCE) format came igyh ckj fd, x, fo'yss"k.k ls irk pyrk gS fd into efect across CBSE schools shows that ftu Nk=ksa us o"kZ 2011 dh d{kk X dh cksMZ dh students who did not appear in 2011 board ijh{kk ugha nh Fkh] mUgksasus o"kZ 2013 dh Xii d{kk dh exams have, in their 2013 class XII boards, cksMZ dh ijh{kk esa Js"B çn'kZu fd;kA outperformed those who appeared for boards in Class X. cksMZ }kjk ns'k Hkj ls nloha d{kk dh cksMZ dh ijh{kk The Board took 100 samples of 30,000 students ¼2011½ nsus okys 30]000 Nk=ksa esa ls ;knsfPNd across India who took Board Based Exams ¼jsaMe½ uewus ds vk/kkj ij 100 uewus fy,A lhlhbZ in class X (2011) through random sampling. ;kstuk ds çHkko dks tkuus ds mís'; ls] ftu Nk=ksa Similar sample size was taken for students who took School Based Assessment (SBA), to assess us Ldwy vk/kkfjr vkdyu ¼,lch,½ dks viuk;k the impact of CCE Scheme. Fkk] muds fy, Hkh uewus fy, x,A vkB eq[; fo"k;ksa vFkkZr~ ys[kkadu] tho foKku] The marks of eight main subjects’ such as, vFkZ'kkL=] jlk;u 'kkL=] xf.kr] HkkSfrd 'kkL=] Accountancy, Biology, Economics, Chemistry, ¶ad'kuy baxfy'k] fgUnh bysfDVo rFkk fgUnh ¼dksj½ Mathematcs, Physics, Functonal English, Hindi ds vad fy, x, rFkk budk fo'ys"k.k fd;k x;kA Electve and Hindi (Core) were compared and analysed. It was observed that the Mean marks ;g ik;k x;k fd ftu Nk=ksa us mDr fo"k;ksa esa in the aforesaid subjects of the students who Ldwy vk/kkfjr vkdyu dks viuk;k Fkk] muds took School Based Assessment was higher çkIrkadksa dk ek/; vf/kd Fkk vkSj muds fu"iknu esa and there was greater consistency in their baxfy'k ¼dksj½] fo"k; ds vfrfjDr vU; fo"k;ksa esa performance except for one i.e. English (Core). vf/kd lkeatL; FkkA baxfy'k ¼dksj½ fo"k; esa Nk=ksa us fiNyh cksMZ ijh{kk In English (Core), students with previous Board dh rqyuk esa csgrj çn'kZu fd;k rFkk ,lch, Nk=ksa experience fared beter with Mean marks of 66 ds vadksa dk ek/; 65 dh rqyuk esa 66 gks x;kA as compared to 65 scored by SBA students. But ijUrq vU; fo"k;ksa esa igyh ckj cksMZ dh ijh{kk nsus in other subjects, the frst-tmers were ahead. okys vkxs FksA 100 Created by: India Offset Press